European Policy Centre – Post Summit Analysis – 23 March 2015

by | Mar 24, 2015

The European Policy Centre (EPC) held an event on the theme of the European Council meeting which took place on Thursday 19 and Friday 20 March in Brussels, with main topics on its agenda: the political endorsement of a limited new grand project – Energy Union, Greek situation – Euro crisis, European Semester and Juncker’s Investment Plan. The panelists analyzed the Greek issue and the Euro crisis covering the formal and informal part of the Summit and the ambivalent Euro crisis narratives of the Member States.

Mr. Emmanouilidis wondered whether the March 2015 Council meeting prepared the ground for a breakthrough between Greece and its lenders. The informal meeting -under a frank and honest atmosphere- of seven indicated that all sides want to identify solutions and that EU partners are ready to grant the newly elected and still inexperienced Greek government more time, despite the negative impressions it made in many EU capitals in its first months in power.

 1200x-1

The March 2015 European Council outcome of an informal ‘mini summit’ between seven EU leaders has the potential to prepare the grounds for a breakthrough in the negotiations between Athens and its lenders, considering that there is no proactive support to Greece, although a compromise is likely to be found. The fact that 26 EU leaders were not invited urged severe reactions from a number of heads of state or government and delayed the start of the European Council meeting. The prime ministers of the Benelux countries were particularly outspoken, expressing their annoyance with the fact that they had not been invited to the exclusive meeting with the Greek prime minister – a ‘mini summit’ with potentially severe repercussions for the euro area and the EU as a whole.

Besides the Greek crisis, two other issues preoccupied the Spring European Council: Energy Union and issues related to Europe’s economy. EU leaders committed themselves to building an Energy Union on the basis of the Commission’s framework strategy, which has the potential to be one of Europe’s major projects in this political cycle and constitutes a balanced strategy with precarious target though. In general, the Summit Conclusions are another strong endorsement of member states’ robust support for an Energy Union. In terms of the European Semester, in almost all EU countries the implementation rate of country-specific recommendations remains low, which means that more substantial reforms are needed to make it more effective. Regarding the Commission’s ambitious Investment Plan, its basic concept points in the right direction –a good idea for Mr. Emmanouilidis-, but its overall potential is in danger of being undermined by a number of factors, making it unclear whether the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) will live up to its expectations.

In this post-summit analysis, Janis A. Emmanouilidis argued that the search for a compromise promises to be a cumbersome, time-consuming and nerve-racking exercise. But a solution now seems possible, proving all those doomsayers who have been predicting a ‘Grexit’ or ‘Graccident’ wrong. On other topics, EU leaders committed their countries to build an Energy Union, although questions remain about whether member states will agree to cede sovereignty on a number of significant points. This analysis looked also at the economic issues dealt with at the Spring Summit, with a focus on the perspectives for the European Semester and the Juncker Investment Plan. He tends to believe that regarding the ‘mini summit’ there is no likelihood of a ‘Grexit’ and highlighted the geopolitical dimension which has been raised up during the Spring Summit. Although for Ms Valentina Pop (WSJ), the risk of a ‘Graccident’ is still there.

C4EPIECE 2024/03 is available online

The 2024/03 edition of our newsletter titled C4EPIECE is published today. The focus of the current edition is the accession of new member states to the NATO and its implications, but we also bring You other important subjects from member states and the global theater...

De-valuation of classic neutrality: Finland and Sweden in the NATO

Sweden – and Finland – had started to express interest in joining the NATO in 2022, due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and while the vast majority of NATO members welcomed the intention, Turkey and Hungary were reluctant to formally approve their accession for a...

The run-up to the US elections: Where do things stand?

(6 March, 2024 - EPC)  SPEAKERS Frances Burwell - Distinguished Fellow, Atlantic Council & Senior Director, McLarty AssociatesGeorgina Wright - Resident Senior Fellow and Deputy Director for International Studies, Institut MontaigneJoão Vale de Almeida - Former...

Reinforcing European Cohesion – event by FEPS

(7 March 2024, FEPS) Together with EU Commissioner Elisa Ferreira and a panel of policy-making experts, the discussion organised by FEPS (Foundation for European Progressive Studies) elaborated on the added value and performance of the Cohesion Policy and tried to...

CEPS Ideas Lab 2024: High-level debate

First Part Moderator: Andrea Renda, Director of Research, CEPS Speakers: Kalypso Nicolaidis, Chair in Global Affairs, School of Transnational Governance, European University InstituteTimothy Garton Ash, Historian and Author, Oxford University The panel opened with the...

Legal Implications of an EU Top Official Stepping Down Early

(21 February, 2024 - Thon Hotel EU, Brussels) Speakers: Simonetta Cook (Advisor, Cabinet of Charles Michel)Quentin Dickinson (Chief Europe Editor, EURADIO)Tamás Lattmann (Associate Professor, Expert on International and European Law, General Manager, C4EP) Moderator:...